The
V.V.A.R.:
Leading the student revolt on campus against speech codes, political
correctness, multiculturalism, gender feminism, dormitory re-education, lying
about
Leonard
Magruder - Founder/President
Former
professor of psychology -
Member:
National Association of Scholars
CONTACT:
Magruder44@aol.com - Phone:
785-312-9303
(
dukesch@aol.com, 480-595-7668)
“I will
inspire terror in the hearts of the unbelievers; you smite them above their
necks and smite all their fingertips off them.”
-Koran 8:2
ISLAM: “VIOLENCE AND LUST”
- John Quincy Adams - 6th
President of the U.S.
March 27, 2006
By Leonard Magruder
This is
why the world is now living in fear. You know the Muslim standing before you
has probably been taught to believe this. That is why the only options before
the Muslim world now are convert, reform, or Islam may be destroyed. The world
cannot live with a religion founded on violence and dreams of sexual orgy. The
violence has been lurking there since the beginning, fueled by the bribe of 72
virgins, and has broken out throughout history as circumstances permitted. Now,
with the development of weapons of mass destruction, Islam believes it can
finally achieve its historical aim of world domination, and all around the
perimeter of the Muslim world, Muslims are murdering their neighbors.
Not “terrorists.”
Muslims.
Tony
Blankley, editor of The Washington Times,
and author of The
West’s Last Chance, said March 8, 2006, in a Townhall.com
article, “Most of the world today is not
only in denial concerning the truly appalling likely consequences of the rise
of radical Islam, it often refuses to even accept unambiguous evidence of its
existence.” He gave as an example the Muslim student at Chapel Hill who told
media he wanted to kill students, “to avenge the deaths of Muslims by Americans
around the world.” Neither the university nor the media would characterize this
event as a terrorist attempt.
Said
Blankley, “The media has pointed out that there is no evidence the Muslim
student was connected to Al Qaeda or a terrorist cell. But that is exactly the
point. As I discussed in my book, the threat to the West is vastly more that
bin Laden and al-Qaeda. The greatest danger is the ferment in Islam that is
generating radical ideas in an unknown, but growing percentage of grass-roots
Muslims around the world - very much including in Europe, and to a lesser
extent, in the U.S.A. The nation cannot design a rational response to the
danger if the nature and extent of the danger is not identified, widely
reported and comprehended. The public has the right and the vital need to have
these events of our time fully and fairly described and reported. As the danger
grows but is not publicly described, the public will first be ignorant and then
fail to demand remedial action. But as incidents are encountered over time, the
public mind will inevitably suspect the worst, and demand stronger action.”
By then
it could be too late.
Islam is
inherently “radical.” That is the real problem. There is no need to qualify it
as such, you can see it in the Koran scripture quoted above and hundreds more
like it.
Blankley
went on to suggest that the values of Islam are totally inimical to western
concepts of tolerance, democracy, equality, and religious freedom.
Or, as
the great Middle East scholar Sir William Muir wrote in 1856 in his 4-volume Life of Muhammad, “The sword of
Muhammad, and the Koran, are the most stubborn enemies of Civilization,
Liberty, and Truth, which the world has yet known.”
This is
what some other great men of the past have said about Islam:
Alexis de Tocqueville, famous 18th century historian:
“I studied the Koran a great deal. I am convinced that by
and large there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as that
of Muhammad. So far as I can see, it is the principle cause of the decadence so
visible today in the Muslim world.”
John Quincy Adams, American president:
“Muhammad proclaimed himself a messenger of Heaven, and
spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. He
poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the
condition of the female sex, and he declared exterminating war as a part of his
religion, against all the rest of mankind. The essence of his religion is
violence and lust. As long as the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false
prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace upon
earth.”
Winston Churchill, British Prime Minister:
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on
its followers! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as
hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. A degraded
sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next life of its
dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Islamic law, Sharia, every woman must
belong to some man as his absolute property, must delay the final extinction of
slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. No
more backward force exists in this world.”
In our time, Ibn Warraq, author of Why I Not a Muslim, said:
“Islam is a totalitarian ideology that aims to control the
religious, social, and political life of mankind in all its aspects. And I mean
Islam. I do not accept some spurious distinction between Islam and Islamic ‘fundamentalism”
or “Islamic terrorists.” Their actions reflect the teachings of Islam, whether
found in the Koran, in the acts and teachings of the Prophet Mohammad, or in
the Islamic law, (Sharia) based on them.”
In all
nine of our articles on this subject since the first on July 31, 2003, we have
concentrated on exposing the connection between terrorism and Islam or the
Koran. Excerpts from these articles may be seen under Articles
on Islam, at v-v-a-r.org. This is from our first article:
V.V.A.R.
Commentary - The
Bind the World is In
There is only one solution to the question of how to save
Washington and New York from nuclear annihilation. A coalition of all the world’s
free nations must threaten the entire Muslim world with catastrophic nuclear
retaliation if as much as one free sparrow falls to the ground. (The French
have already moved in this direction. To some degree, so have we. See our
comments on the new U.S. nuclear doctrine, Massive
Nuclear Cover-up, at v-v-a-r.org.)
The scriptures that permit terrorism are right there in
the Koran, which is why the Muslim world, in an unparalleled moral failure, did
not unambiguously and universally condemn the 9/11 attack on America. Islam is
not a religion of peace. It is a religion of war. It has no equivalent to “love
your enemies.” And non-Muslim religions have no equivalent to “kill the
unbelievers.” The terrorists are not “radicals.” They are the true Muslims they
claim to be because they adhere strictly to the letter of the Koran, as the
Koran demands, and the rest of the Muslim world admires them for this, worries
that they should be doing the same, and is rapidly joining them.
When things go wrong, as they have since the fall of the
Ottoman Empire, the world of Islam, hoping to get right again with God, cries “Back
to the Sharia,” that legalistic horror based on the Koran, seen most clearly in
the practices of the Taliban and in Saudi Arabia; beheadings, arms and legs cut
off, people stoned, beaten, and executed for the slightest minor offense. And
back to the call in the Koran to spread Islam and the Sharia, through murder if
necessary, to the whole world.
But of course the civilized world, in contrast to this ancient
desert barbarism, would never accept the monstrous brutalities of the Sharia.
So that means war. And that is the nature of the bind the world is in.”
Look again at what Osama bin Laden said in his original
pronouncement of Jihad against America on Feb. 23, 1998:
“We, with God’s help, call on every Muslim who believes in
God and wishes to be rewarded to comply with God’s order to kill the Americans
and plunder their money...divide their nation, tear them to shreds, destroy
their economy, burn their companies, ruin their welfare, sink their ships, and
kill them on land, sea, and air.”
Is America under any obligation to stand by and let this
happen? Do we have to live in dread every day that one of our cities will
disappear overnight? That fear is casting a pall over all our days. The Muslim
world needs to understand that we are not going to live with this. We need to
plan a new collective defense strategy now, because the current strategy cannot
work.
Once we understand that the Islamists have but one motive,
to radicalize all Muslim nations into a monolithic bloc to either convert or
slaughter the rest of the world, then the only choice is to try to survive. But
the step by step, or “one terrorist at a time, “ or one container at a time,
approach cannot work. There are a minimum of 70,00 terrorists in cells around
the world waiting to strike. While we are eliminating one, the others can be
planting nuclear devices in our cities. The only solution is some variant of
Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), the solution by which we kept Communist
Russia at bay for 50 years. All the free nations of the world must mass their
collective forces in a military coalition surrounding all Muslim nations. The
Muslim world is then warned that in the case of a nuclear or equivalent attack
on America, or any nation in the coalition, there will be a catastrophic
nuclear attack on, and possible subsequent invasion of, any or all Muslim
nations. At this stage the plan is admittedly crude. Some selectivity will
obviously have to be involved. But the basic idea is to warn those who try to
implement jihad that they will be responsible for catastrophic damage to their
homelands and their fellow Muslims.
It is important to note that this plan is conditional in
nature. Nothing really need happen. The message is, “If you do that...we will
do this.”
A very
important breakthrough on this front, the truth about Islam, is expected to
result from the upcoming national symposium organized by Jeff Epstein and
others, The Radical
Islamic Threat to World Peace and National Security, to take place in
Arlington, Virginia on April 29, 2006, which will focus on this connection
between Islam and terrorism, or “jihad.”
From WorldNetDaily.com:
“Take off the kid gloves and wage all-out war against radical Islam at home and
abroad. That’s the message organizers of a symposium on terrorism plan to give
the U.S. and its leaders through an all-star roster of speakers. The symposium
will feature globally recognized journalists, academicians, and
counter-terrorism experts, “to inform the public of the reality of the threat
of radical Islam to every man, women, and child within the United States. This
evil must be crushed decisively in all of its manifestations throughout the
world, including mosques and Islamic centers within the United States.”
If
adequately reported on, this could be the turning point, redirecting America
towards a true understanding of the deadly enemy it faces, and the beginning of
the end of left/liberal attempts to misinform on the crisis, on campus and in
the media. This could be when America learns how our intellectual elites have
lied to them, who the real enemy is, and where the solution lies to the problem
of terrorism. It lies, as spelled out in the new U.S. nuclear policy, in a
threat of nuclear retaliation on any entity that attempts to destroy an
American city.
Following
are some of the items reported in the news over the last few years, telling of
the danger America faces from Islam.
al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, November 2001:
Osama bin Laden told Humid Mir, editor of “Dawn,” a
Pakistani newspaper, who repeated it in a recent CNN program, “We have chemical
and nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons are not difficult to obtain if you have
contacts in Russia with other Islamist groups. They are available for $10
million and $20 million.”
Telegraph.co.uk, and “Liberation”, October 28, 2003:
“President Jacques Chirac has threatened to retaliate with
nuclear strikes against any state found to be responsible for a large-scale
terrorist attack on France. In the biggest shift in French nuclear doctrine for
40 years M. Chirac revealed that the French nuclear deterrent had already been
reconfigured to allow it to destroy the “power centers” of any state which
sponsored a terrorist assault.
Associated Press, November 16, 2003:
“Surrounded by five masked men carrying missiles Aba Salma
Al-Hijazi, an al-Qaeda commander, said, ‘a huge and very courageous strike’ will
take place…and that the number of ‘infidels’ expected to be killed in the
attack exceeds 100,000. He stated that the attacks will be carried out in a way
that will ‘amaze the world’ and turn al-Qaeda into an organization that ‘horrifies
the world until the law of Allah (Sharia) is implemented.”
al- Qaeda, in a statement claiming credit for the Madrid
bombing, March 11, 2004:
“We announce the good news for Muslims in the world that
the strike of the black wind of death, the expected strike against America, is
now in its final stages - 90 percent ready - and it is coming soon.”
“60 Minutes,” November 14, 2004:
“Osama bin Laden now has religious approval to use a
nuclear device against Americans, Michael Scheuer, the former head of the CIA
unit charged with tracking down the Saudi terrorist, told Steve Kroft on ‘60
Minutes’ Sunday. “Even if bin Laden had a nuclear weapon, he wouldn’t have used
it for a lack of proper religious authority, authority he now has.” The
approval found that bin Laden was perfectly within his rights to use them, to
kill up to four million Americans, two million of them children.”
Here is
the most recent overview of the situation with regard to bin Laden’s plot for
an “American Hiroshima,” from an interview between FrontPage Magazine and Paul
Williams. Williams is an FBI consultant and award-winning investigative
journalist, the author of Osama’s
Revenge and recently, The
al-Qaeda Connection.
“Nuclear weapons sales to al Qaeda have been verified by a
host of intelligence officials and weapons inspectors, including Hans Blix,
former Director General of the U.N.’s International Atomic Energy Agency. The
sales were even verified by bin Laden and al-Zawahiri in their pronouncement
that they have obtained a small arsenal of nuclear weapons from black-market
sources. Nukes have also been forward employed to al-Qaeda cells in Canada,
Mexico, and the U.S. Taking all things into consideration, the attack should
occur in the very near future. The bombs which bin Laden began building in 1992
are for the ‘American Hiroshima.’
“There isn’t just one team, but at least seven, according
to Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and other al-Qaeda operatives. You can’t trust
Khalid, but you can trust the information that was obtained from his laptop
when he was arrested on March 1, 2003. They are working within mosques and
Islamic centers in the U.S.. Federal judges will not provide any FBI or law
enforcement agency with a warrant to search a mosque or an Islamic center for
any reason since such places are listed as ‘houses of worship.’
“The terrorists are in at least seven metropolitan areas,
which have been identified as New York, Miami, Houston, Las Vegas, Los Angeles,
Chicago, and Washington, D.C.. The attack will occur simultaneously at these
seven sites. Al-Qaeda insists that over 4 million Americans must die for the
sake of parity. They are intent upon realizing this objective and the doomsday
clock by all reckoning is very near midnight.
“We have no way of insuring the validity of any of these
reports, and we have no wish to be alarmists. But, putting all of the above
together its seems pretty clear that America may be in mortal danger, and that
we should take action, as the French have, to protect the nation now in a
presidential announcement to the world of a warning of nuclear retaliation. The
time has come to answer the question we have raised in each of our articles, ‘How
will America respond in case of a nuclear attack?’ In a nuclear attack of the
magnitude described by Williams, the heart, the economy, and the superstructure
of America will be gone, along with the economy of much of the rest of the
world.
“Certainly, by far the most urgent task facing the nation
is how to work out a strategy of deterrence, such as we had in our Mutually
Assured Destruction policy with Russia (MAD). And certainly the claims being
made by Williams in his new book, such as a simultaneous nuclear attack on
seven American cities, should be the subject of intense scrutiny, discussion,
and report to the American people by the media.
“This whole idea of a cleric assuring someone that God has
approved of the murder of millions of American children is, of course, obscene,
illustrating once again the abject moral poverty and insanity of Islamic
thinking. But we know they would do it, we saw it in practice when followers of
Islam killed over three hundred school children in Russia, shooting them in the
back as they ran, or cutting their throats. It is the insanity, the total
irrationality at the heart of Islam that we must protect against. Set up an
encircling wall of a threat of nuclear retaliation, then start on challenging,
exposing, dismantling, Islam as a valid religion. Liberate the hundreds of
millions of God’s children from this horror, this hoax.
‘America is the reason for all
oppression, injustice, licentiousness, or suppression that is the Muslim’s lot.
It stands behind all the disasters that were caused and are still being caused
to the Muslims, it is immersed in the blood of Muslims and cannot hide this. We
have the right to kill four million Americans - two million of them children.’
-Osama bin laden.
“America spits on these charges as the monstrous lies of
one more murderous psychopathic victim of the Koran. And we will immerse the
Muslim world in blood if they so much as touch the head of one American child.”
This
article may be reproduced in any form. Copy this article, distribute, add us as a link.
Founder/President,
V.V.A.R.
Phone: 785-312-9303
Website design and
management courtesy of Annette R. Hall. Hosted by www.i-served.com.